Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isomorph Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kate Moross. (non-admin closure) Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Isomorph Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Page is also heavy in WP:PROMO and focuses heavily on Kate Moross, who already has an article that includes much of the info about Isomorph found here. Examples of apparent coverage are also primarily about Moross, on closer inspection. For example, this interview is primarily about her design on the record sleeves rather than any function of the record label itself. This interview is the only coverage I was able to locate that focuses on the record label and its artists instead of exclusively focusing on Moross' design. Sources included in the article are mostly external links to self-published material and vendors who sold the records. One FACT article appears to be a release announcement. I believe the other is the photographed label profile linked above (the Flickr caption notes that it's from FACT). This leaves us with one brief, interview-heavy source. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kate Moross. The label has been defunct since 2012, and it appears that during its entire existence it only ever released the five non-notable singles already mentioned in the text. There is nothing to merge, since the text and citations from the one reliable source, FACT magazine, are already reproduced word for word at the proposed redirect target. Richard3120 (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect my search does not turn up enough notability and Richard3120 proposes a good target for a redirect. Lightburst (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Richard3120 and I'm fine if it is deleted first because of PROMO.  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.