Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ispatika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Ispatika

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced stub created by a SPA editor. No independent references, apparently not listed in any database (let alone selective ones). No homepage to be found through Google. Upon request, the article creator provided a link, but it is dead. Google search turns up one or two mentions on the home pages of some academics mentioning that they are a member of the editorial board of this journal. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; fails WP:GNG and WP:NJournals, as outlined in the nomination. --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 16:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even passing verifiability looks difficult for this one, as there are no third-party sources and the home page link given in the article is dead. WP:NJournals looks farther out of reach. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not detectable by non-heroic means. —chaos5023 (talk) 17:40, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.