Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ispirer Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Ispirer Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article by a WP:SPA but without a WP:DISCLOSE declaration. I proposed deletion with the rationale " An article sourced to press releases and WP:USERGENERATED sites about the company's products. No evidence provided or found to show that the company is of encyclopaedic notability." The Prod notice was removed by another new WP:SPA account, with a statement on the Talk page which indicates affiliation ("our page", etc.). I am now bringing the article to AfD with the same rationale as my earlier Prod. AllyD (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Why even look at the sources when they have names like "1888pressrelease.com" - (not even the best in press releases, what scrubs) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Quite apart from the paid editing / CoI issue, this company fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello,. I wanted to ask you, could you please put this article in draft space? Or give some more time till the deletion? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diana Zamorina (talk • contribs)
 * The article was previously in Draft space and was moved into main space . Whether draft or published, what is in question here is whether encyclopaedic notability can be demonstrated from independent in-depth coverage, and it is best to pursue that discussion to conclusion. And I remind you again about WP:DISCLOSE. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * DeleteFails WP:CORPDEPTH and written in a promotion manner.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello,. I got your point. As to WP:DISCLOSE i wrote here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Diana_Zamorina#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest that currently i work at this company. And my work was to translate the existing article in Russian. i assure you that this article is not for promoting, its just this company's history. A deleted the extract about Ispirer's product as it might be considered as promo.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.