Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isrg Rajan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletion requested by author, no need for AFD to continue. Friday (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Isrg Rajan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. I don't believe this person is independently notable and believe there is COI editing going on by the article creator. JMHamo (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Why should not be deleted: I went on Google and Bing search and found that most of people has raised the question about this person. I believe that this article should be on wikipedia. It will be more delighting to add more contents and sources other then nominating this article for deletion. Somehow this article is not harming a social or a community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iraag (talk • contribs) 18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Can you please explain in which way this person meets Notability (people) criteria? What exactly has he done to merit an article? AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Please see the http://epaper.patrika.com/42226/Jabalpur-Patrika/13-06-2012#page/16/1 for more information. This will clear your doubts. I've added some more reliable sources, since the template asked for secondary sources Iraag (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm unable to read that. What does it say about Rajan, and how does it establish that he is notable by Wikipedia standards?
 * And as for your 'references', citing a page merely because it has the letters 'ISRG' on it won't fool anyone - if I see you adding another fake reference like that again, I will report the matter. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete unless subject has considerable coverage in proper sources. So far, he's somebody who has a website, and did well on some test.  Looks like self-promotion, and I see nothing yet to indicate why Wikipedia would have an article on this person.  Friday (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per G7- Main contributor to the article might have requested deletion by blanking the page Hitro   talk  19:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.