Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issam Hamid Al Bin Ali Al Jayfi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Issam Hamid Al Bin Ali Al Jayfi

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:BIO. Hasn't received sufficient significant attention from reliable independent sources. A short entry in Andy Worthingtons work describing all Guantanamo's detainees is all that is available. Searching for either the article title or Issam Al Jayfi did not return further significant results from independent reliable sources on Google Books, Scholar, News Archives, or regular Google. Fram (talk) 10:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Repeat for the dozens of identical articles that have similar lack of content. THF (talk) 22:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Swarm   X 13:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not individually notable other than for a being a detainee at Guantanamo, per WP:MILMOS/N. Article is in many ways just a repeat of similar infomation in a number of other articles.Anotherclown (talk) 20:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: doesn't seem to be any more notable than any other Guantanamo detainee. Additionally, it doesn't seem to meet the requirements for signficant coverage in independent reliable sources, in my opinion. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.