Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueTrak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -Scottywong | yak _ 17:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

IssueTrak

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Subject's notability is not indicated. Third-party sources are trivial company data lists, not related to product and not significant coverage. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources given are run of the mill profiles, there is no news, and no significant coverage in other publications that I found. Facebook, twitter, etc. but not from anything that is even borderline reliable.   Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  01:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Looking hard for any WP:RS and thought I had come up with something here but at the end, it even says that the "source" is from IssueTrak. Honestly, I feel that the software is on the more significant side, but unfortunately, anything that could be cited or referenced is not 3rd party. - Pmedema (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.