Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's a SpongeBob Christmas! Album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. the wub "?!"  14:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

It's a SpongeBob Christmas! Album

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was originally nominated as part of a bundle nomination of equally non-significantly-covered animated soundtrack albums, but commenters ignorant about the coverage of the topics tried to convince me they were somehow individually notable. The commenters used lousy reasoning, or WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, in trying to suggest certain topics in that nomination had individual notability. One suggested a couple of albums were by notable artists, which didn't make them notable as Notability is not inherited. Another agued "some of these articles are getting 100+ views/day", which is an invalid WP:POPULARPAGE argument. Another agued "Deleting the articles in question would delete the not insignificant article histories and revisions that could serve as rough drafts for future versions of these pages if they hold up to notability standards at a later date", which is invalid as most of these soundtracks never do and even so, we are not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.

For this nomination, all there is is WP:ONEVENT press release announcements and one Common Sense Media review. That's not enough to establish WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Wired cite is not about soundtrack album but about the special itself. 👨x🐱 (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - There are some issues with the copy/pasted reasoning in the rush of 21 different AfDs for cartoon soundtracks by this nominator. In short, blanket reasoning for an attempted bundled AfD has been applied to every individual album therein. See Articles for deletion/The Pebble and the Penguin (soundtrack) for more details. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - A substantial article about the album (and not just the associated film) in Wired counts as non-trivial coverage under WP:NALBUM #1. This article could use some cleanup though. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Even so, that stuff could just as well be in the film article, plus it was published upon the film's release so that's not long-lasting notability. 👨x🐱 (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:NTEMP. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 16:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:SINGLEEVENT. 👨x🐱 (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That one is for people. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 21:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Doomsdayer520's rationale and Wired article. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.