Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's a skull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

It's a skull

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prodded for WP:GNG and WP:NSONG with no references and no claim of notability. Prod removed with the comment, "this is definitely relevant, and the capitalization is correct per the original usage. this is one of the first "memes" -- thus its historical relevance. (I deleted the recommendation for article deletion)" Now brought to AfD for further discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I know this song exists, and the user who removed the prod was correct, this was one of the first "memes", in the middle 1990s, before most of the people who use "memes" were even born. However, the only references I can supply are to the magazine itself. I had the actual song on an AP coverdisk myself from the middle 1990s to the middle 2000s, but I fear I have since thrown it away. I might still have the actual file saved on my computer (I transferred the entire hard disk of my A4000 to a modern Linux PC before the A4000 died), but I'm not at all certain about it. J I P  &#124; Talk 19:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge into Valhalla: Before the War at the risk of WP:COATRACK --- :D Derry Adama (talk) 03:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. The calls for keep above have no policy-backed rationale. If the subject is indeed important, it will have received significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had zero hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. I would entertain a redirect to Before the War (as a useful search term) but only if this subject was mentioned and reliably sourced within the article, which it is not. czar ⨹   21:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article has no references, let alone any reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a single [{WP:RS]], not sure why it is notable Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 16:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NSONG. The article has no references at all, let alone significant coverage in reliable sources. Random86 (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.