Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Happened 'That Night'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

It Happened 'That Night'

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another episode in a franchise series. Episode 48. How is this notable enough for an article. I'm not seeing the WP:RS that justifies this... --David Tornheim (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Please also see a similar article from same series I simultaneously submitted for deletition: Articles_for_deletion/In_the_Eye_Abides_the_Heart --David Tornheim (talk) 05:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep I don't like it isn't an appropriate deletion rationale. Try again, and be more specific about why you want this deleted. Not seeing any RS issues with this article at all.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Not seeing any RS issues. Of the the 3 references in the article, which do you think meet the notability requirements?  Looks like very trivial coverage to me insufficient to justify an article.   --David Tornheim (talk) 04:38, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'll just link to the other episode's nomination thread, because upon looking for sources to attest to this subject's notability, I noticed my rationale there can be copied practically verbatim to be applied here, with the sole exception that I also found a press release for this one, which also doesn't advance notability. Comment: Upon further inspection of the Pretty Little Liars category, there are numerous standalone articles for characters and episodes from the series that ostensibly warrant their own article just as much as if not less than these two episodes (note: this is not meant to be WP:WAX, so much as it is a calling out of those articles).  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  06:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lacks notability per TheTechnician27's rationale. Large amount of unsourced content raises concerns of original research. I looked at several episodes and find that many have the same issues with sourcing that includes an unsourced "Plot" section. I also have an issue with the need or want to inundate Wikipedia with the same two "External links" advertising IMDb and TV.com on every article, regardless that they not actually contain important "further research", needed and otherwise unavailable television credits, a further understanding of the subject that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, or possibly anything beyond just being links that promote the sites. Otr500 (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * delete not notable in its own right. Sources not at all enough. —NCPTalk 19:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.