Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Has To Be (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   A9 by PeterSymonds, NAC Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

It Has To Be (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Primarily, the lack of sources, which make notability questionable and hard to determine (as not all albums make the cut in my understanding). More importantly, as an album without sources, I am always wary of a hoax. Tyrenon (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A9 this and the other two John Watts articles, as the artist in question does not have an article and no other notability is asserted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.