Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Just Gets Worse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

It Just Gets Worse

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An album lacking in reliable sources coverage. The only review I could find in reliable sources was the AllMusic one already in the article - there is a review at Sputnik Music but it is by a user not by staff. (Also beware that on google there is a Sputnik Music link that contains adware). The album is already covered in more depth on the band page particularly in the lyrics section. I had redirected it there but the redirect has been contested so bringing it here. Please be advised that the tracklist is offensive and searching with the band name will include unsavoury results. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks notability. Balle010 (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I also can find nothing beyond the AllMusic review, but it is knowledgeable and fairly in-depth. This atrocious band was offensive on purpose and got attention for that reason, and so did their albums. Per Wikipedia precedent, the reliable AllMusic review is probably enough to allow a stub article. If this AfD ends up in "no consensus" purgatory because of my vote, the title could be redirected to the band's article and quotes from the AllMusic review could be used there as background info. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 13:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I found some reliable sources which talk about the album:, , , and . With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Most of those are not reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: There's no reason to delete it. AllMusic is a reliable enough source, and the guy above just found several other sources of information for it. Also, the offensiveness is the joke. I don't find it offensive, as their intentions are always clearly comedic. Nothing worth getting offended over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperconductormanII (talk • contribs) 20:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It wasn't nominated for deletion because it is offensive, but because it is largely unknown and never covered by reliable music media, except briefly by AllMusic. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non-notable album. Only reliable source I found the Allmusic review. (Interestingly the biography page of the band itself is blank.) I have also found the Sputnikmusic review but it was written by a user. I have also found a Metal Storm review but it was written by a user as well. The rest of the results are the standard trash sites like Metal Archives, Discogs, Rate Your Music, Amazon, eBay, Spotify, etc, etc. The sites cited by Superastig are blogs/webzines, I have doubts about their notability. AxCx were offensive but that was part of the joke. Their song titles and presentation always crack me up. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per doomsdayer520. Looking at the article history, it looks more of a case of censoring content, rather than removing a non-notable album.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.