Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Should Be Easy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anyone is free to improve the article's sourcing with the sources indicated in this discussion. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 00:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

It Should Be Easy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSONGS. ("Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. [...] Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability.") Anything that can be said about this track can be summarized in the album article. Delete/redirect to Britney Jean. Sricsi (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sricsi (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep: There's already a couple sources in there which should be decent, plus I found these three (Plus this fourth which is a blog but the author has strong credentials so it may still be usable, and in fact is used on English WP a lot already). You've also got charting info for multiple countries. QuietHere (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure Thatgrapejuice.net is a suitable source. As for the other ones, they don't really detail anything about the track, besides asking the question if the song could be the next single. Detailed coverage of the song is only found in album reviews. --Sricsi (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes GNG with the sources already in the article, the sources given by QuietHere, and at least one more here. Rlendog (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NSONG with sources presented above. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 05:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is a tough one. While I appreciate the time and energy QuietHere put into their comments, I have concerns about the citations's quality. Thatgrapejuice.net and Idolator are not considered reliable or appropriate sources for Wikipedia (at least in my experience). MuuMuse is generally not suitable, but I can understand the argument for the author. I do not know about Musictimes.com while Rolling Stone is obviously reliable. I am uncertain either way so I will not do a vote, but I did want to express my concerns about some of the sources proposed here. Aoba47 (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.