Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ita O'Brien


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  15:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Ita O'Brien

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entertainment industry professional. Probably fails WP:GNG. The cited sources are not about her, but about the wider topic of intimacy coordinator (I wrote that article, so I am familiar with the topic). O'Brien is generally only quoted or mentioned.  Sandstein  17:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep Seem to be a fair number of name drops on three continents, indicating an industry professional doing her job. Also found this: on an editorially controlled site. I think it is changed to weak keep, from delete.   scope_creep Talk  11:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ita's work
 * Keep - Article is cited with reliable sources. The subject clearly meets notability guidelines and passes WP:BIO and WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - reliable sources have specifically covered her work. William Avery (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.