Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian Cricket TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. Consensus is clear. BD2412 T 00:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Italian Cricket TV

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional concerns and clear WP:NORG fail. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article seems promotional. Peacock terms have been used. The creator of the article may have close relation with the subject or being paid in exchange of creating the article. Besides, it fails WP:TVSERIES. I can't really understand how the article passed through the AfC process. &mdash;  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 04:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The promotional language concerns don't sway me as that can be addressed through editing. The lack of significant coverage, however, puts me firmly on the side of delete. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Fails WP:NORG, looks promotional Alex-h (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable and overly promotional. StickyWicket (talk) 18:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant NORG fail Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.