Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian Violinmakers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  jj137  ♠ 22:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Italian Violinmakers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No citations or other proof provided which establish this product's notability or importance. Stifle (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No notability proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability guidelines. No sources provided. No ISBN provided, which could cover the quotes. Rt . 17:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as unsourced OR. Cirt (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Weak delete. Google Books search indicates that the book is cited as a reference in other high-quality works on violins and violin-makers, but I couldn't find even a good independent quote about it (e.g. "indispensable reference", that sort of thing) to buttress notability. Probably not much to say about it beyond a library listing unless reviews could be found in offline music publications. --Dhartung | Talk 18:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, non-notable, possible OR.  STORMTRACKER   94  22:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but rename - A book that has reached its eighth edition is likely to be notable. The article is a stub, and probably a poor one, but that is a reason for improving it, not deleting it.  The title is perhaps unsatisfactory, in that oen would expect an article on violin makers, not on a book about them.  Peterkingiron (talk) 00:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Musical Instruments has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 15:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe ok to use as a notable source for improving/creating individual violin maker articles like Stradivari, not for its own article. -Bikinibomb (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.