Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italygate conspiracy theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Italygate conspiracy theory

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This doesn't seem notable enough to be its own topic, given the shortage of sources actually covering the subject. Since their ideologies are practically the same (the article itself describes this theory as "QAnon-adjacent", I think this article should be merged to the main QAnon article, with the appropriate content to go with it. Love of Corey (talk) 23:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree due to above reasons, just I'd prefer to see this in Attempts to overturn the 2020 Election, but I'm indifferent on which article.InvadingInvader (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment as creator: I am inclined to agree to a merge but keeping the current page as a redirect (Italygate and Italy gate both link there as redirects). I don't think the QAnon article is the best to merge it into (not all of the references mention it); I'd also prefer to merge into Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election. – Bangalamania (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Six months after first reporting, ongoing and deepening international RS coverage;    satisfies EVENT.


 * Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as I don't see a good merge target - QAnon is only adjacent and already quite large. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 05:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG demonstrated by . The theory's claims are much less important than the story of its origin and promotion. A good article will give context to future developments.HouseOfChange (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: Has more than sufficient references in WP:RS over at least 6 months (January - June 2021) to meet WP:GNG. Banana Republic (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks to meet WP:GNG.-- Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk 02:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.