Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 12:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Itelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, all sources are affiliated. GNews turns up some additional sources, but not enough to establish notability. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - This looks a lot like an advertisement, they list all their solutions like they're trying to sell something. Add the fact that the sources are affiliated and unreliable, and that the page is an orphan, and you're possibly looking at a speedy deletion. Aerospeed (Talk) 14:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: The awards declared in the article are from affiliate firms so lack independence. Highbeam turns up a variety of PR announcements but I am seeing nothing to indicate attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.