Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itex Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Itex Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article seems a classic case of WP:ARTSPAM - I have looked and can't find any evidence that it is inherently notable. It was first flagged in 2009, doesn't seem to have any significant work done on it since, has had no improvement of content that would make it WP:NPOV, and seems like an advert for search engine placement purposes. Orderinchaos 17:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

 Delete: Subject of the article fails WP:NCORP. Reuters source is a press release, therefore doesn't contribute to establish notability. Other sources lead no where, some home page of some websites, some goes unreachable. There are two links to Securities and Exchange Commission, reliable sources, but it doesn't help to establish notability of the subject as well. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  11:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.