Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itzhak Avraham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zimperium. Preserving history in case someone has material that could be merged over. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Itzhak Avraham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Avraham is a non-notable businessman John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Zimperium. Founding a multimillion$$$ tech company does confer notability, but since, at this pont, I don't find sources for an independent article, name should be redirected to the corporation he founded.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Zimperium, as above.--Geewhiz (talk) 05:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge to Zimperium, since it's his only achievement as for now. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect as I'm not seeing how he can honestly be independently notable anytime soon thus I'm not comfortable with keeping this if the essential parts are simply the company itself thus delete and link there. SwisterTwister   talk  06:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as overly promotional. The subject is not independently notable per available sources. Then redirect to Zimperium. I'm not sure that the latter is notable either, but that can be dealt with separately. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.