Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iuput II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 19:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Iuput II

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

this page, like many others created or edited by User talk:Egyptzo, is basically copyvio from and, deleting the copyvio will leave virtually nothing. I'm too busy clearing up other stuff to work on it (user is banned for 48 hours for other copyvio--Doug Weller (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC))
 * delete as copyvio. The article may be relevant and useful to people and the subject may be notable enough for his own article but, it is copyvio. Maybe when, the user returns we could encourage him to use the things he is copying as sources to create legit articles. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * keep with major revisions. This king existed and there is a legitimate image of him by Captmondo. The article can be preserved but there must be major corrections done to it to remove the copyright violations. I'll try to reduce it to a stub and give appropriate references. Leoboudv (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * keep Provided 7 genuine references and removed copyvio. Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * keep Egyptzo is well known for this sort of thing, but the subject matter is real enough. I also trust Leoboudv to come up with real citations & re-write what is legitimate. Captmondo (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, it was rewritten and bears no resemblance to the copied text now. – Alensha   talk  22:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the changes made to the article. Please someone that knows how to do the crossline thing on my earlier input. Thank you. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nominators concerns have been addressed so there is now no reason to delete this. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm happy now. Impressed even that Leoboudv could salvage it! Thanks. Do I need to do something now? --Doug Weller (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.