Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Dorschner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Ivan Dorschner

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ENT. Ironholds (talk) 08:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as too soon in his career, and thus failing WP:GNG and WP:ENT. If a Philippine Wikiepdian can find sources that I cannot, I'll gladly revisit my !vote.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for now he isn't even out of the PBB house yet! How can he become a notable actor if he is still only in the house? When he becomes notable, feel free to recreate (note: I am a Filipino Wikipedian, but I agree with above). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just because he appeared in some game show before joining PBB doesn't entitle him to some notability here. I think fantards built this article. --Eaglestorm (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. the article has been redirected to the show.--Eaglestorm (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Exterminate: The page is completely invalid. He is not an actor. He never did any television shows except for PBB. He was a dayplayer on the only "project" listed on his IMDB page. He is an unnotable person. The page is obviously fan-made and is totally against the Wikipedia rules. There are no references and the information listed is on a fan's point of view, its not formal and lacks complete structure. What else would you need for that?... --TwelveOz (talk) 21:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.