Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan valles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Ivan valles

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NN Unable to find independent verifiable info. Self-promotion more than anything. Taroaldo (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, would be happy to provide you with all supporting documentation, please let me know to what email address.
 * Delete: trivial 3rd party coverage, self-promotion. JamesBurns (talk) 03:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Please refer to WP:BIO and WP:V for some info. If there are verifiable sources, they can be entered directly into the article. Sources need to be accessible and visible to all users of Wikipedia.  Taroaldo (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I've uploaded some supported information and checked these guidelines. I'll be uploading the discography soon. Please review the article and let me know if it is according to your guidelines. Thanks.
 * Delete. Two single-sentence mentions in the "what are our graduates doing now?" section of a music schools' magazine don't add up to notability.  We need significant coverage that's completely independent of the subject. JulesH (talk) 12:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm uploading evidences from newspapers and magazines. These are obviously verifiable sources which you can check by requesting the original to the country of origin. The problem is I obviously don't control the copyrights to these so I would like you to review a few that i've uploaded, and the rest I would like to simply send them to you via email, so that you can review the info and verify that they are notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivancillo (talk • contribs) 19:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

