Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivana Raymonda van der Veen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Ivana Raymonda van der Veen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for a non-notable artist. References are all PR websites or the subject's own social media sites &#32; (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 21:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete since not seeing sources in Netherlands news, worldwide news, music-related news, even a non-filtered search doesn't yield much, the CNN 'source' has a message saying CNN did not verify the information.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep since the subject's online fame and commercial success is spreading fast, so while her references are currently all online and of the "fan page" type, this article will surely get beefed up in coming months. I've already been into the article to cut away some of the fluff.--Videowilliams (talk) 14:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC) — Videowilliams (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * so...not just yet.&#32; (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article is rather sad, desperately trying to push a non-notable artist. Its main contributors,, and  are all single purpose accounts with a very obvious conflict of interest. In addition, it is a straight cut-and-paste job from the subject's own website  - even if she was notable, the article should be deleted as a copyright violation &#32; (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.