Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iyuru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 19:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Iyuru

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks sources to show notability, and all indications are that such sources do not exist. The paper in which the theory will be contained has yet to be published, according to the article. PROD tag was removed without substantive comment. lifebaka++ 16:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete WP:MADEUP violation without sources. --WngLdr34 (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no speedy delete criteria for madeup things/ideas. That said there is no indication that this concept is notable.  The initial publication of the concept hasn't happened yet, so no reliable sources can discusss it.   GB fan  talk 19:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of reliable sources. Sounds like a case of WP:MADEUP.  Good idea, but really needs to be better adopted in the psychology circles. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)\
 * Strong Delete. The only thing keeping this from being speedy deleted as a G3 Hoax is that there is actually a website with this name. If the concept becomes notable later, great - recreate it then. But for now, it's a neologism that hasn't even been properly created yet. Premature at best, Hoax at worst. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly speedy delete, an apparent movement, organization, or web content that shows no sign of minimal importance. The website does exist; the page that proposes to answer "What is IYURU" enlightens us with: This is an example of a WordPress page, you could edit this to put information about yourself or your site so readers know where you are coming from.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nonsense. The subject, even if exists, is described inappropriately for an encyclopedia. The article can be recreated later - nothing useful in this article. Materialscientist (talk) 01:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.