Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iza Valentine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Iza Valentine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced and of questionable notability. Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 17:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep - I'm not sure of what the relevant policy is relating to racehorses but she's won an award (1985 California broodmare of the year, per here), her death has been reported on several hobby/industry specific sites (here and here), and been the subject of analysis here. All those articles appear to be written by or largely mirror the horse's owner, but on the other hand they're published in places that have editorial oversight.  I'd appreciate insight from an expert on the topic and it may be an appropriate candidate for article rescue. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - With the links provided above by DustFormsWords, the minimum threshold for notability is probably met, although barely. California broodmare of the year and several successful foals provides notability, and Bloodhorse and Thoroughbred Times are two respected publications within the racing world. Dana boomer (talk) 00:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.