Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izin Hash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted under CSD G5 by Ponyo on 22 July 2022. (non-admin closure) – NJD-DE (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Izin Hash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Hope subject meets both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR very well. There are so many international articles about the subject to prove his notability. But one user move this to draft space. Finally, decided let this go through AFD. If this fails the criteria, then delete. Thank you. That Mallu Guy (talk) 11:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, United Arab Emirates, India,  and Kerala. That Mallu Guy (talk) 11:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment That is possibly the most unhelpful nomination I have ever seen. Nomination updated to at least be of some use to participants. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: classic case of TOOSOON, no significant contribution to the field.  Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 17:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Reply  as per WP:NACTOR, he passes the criteria. He has significant roles in multiple notable films and advertisements. Kindly please do a WP:BEFORE, before voting delete. He has significant coverage in international newspapers as well. That Mallu Guy (talk) 01:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete As, effectively, the article creator AND the person nominating the article for deletion, there's a certain cheek to asking participants to do a WP:BEFORE - surely at least worth a consideration is that if there are sources not presented in the article that contribute to notability of the subject that you would have added these before/when you took it to AfD? The guideline that applies here, beyond WP:GNG ("has had significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") is WP:NACTOR - "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions or has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." The key word here in both cases is 'significant' and this is where, IMHO, we fall down. It's not really about whether there are more sources to be found by searching, but that the case being made here for notability is based on two very minor film roles and some TVC work. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I have (within the bounds of decency and legality, I hope) reverted the non-admin closure of this AfD performed by a) the nominator, an involved party who is b) a blocked sock. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine. General rule of thumb at afd is that it can't be speedy kept (withdrawn) if there are any legitimate delete !votes already presented. In this case, there are so the afd needs to at least run the course (unless we then get considerable a delete pile-on, then WP:SNOW may be considered). Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.