Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jörg Kurt Wegner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Deleted -- Cyde↔Weys 18:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Jörg Kurt Wegner
No assertion of notability - getting a PhD in a scientific field doesn't automatically make you notable. Cyde↔Weys 03:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, lack of notability. Appears to have all of four papers in the field (in English at least), none with wide impact. (Kind of interesting though.) Opabinia regalis 04:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the JCIM and the QSAR & Combinatorial Science journal have a high impact in the field of cheminformatics. Although, I agree, that the impact compared to Nature and Science is much lower;-) Again, feel free to delete the article. JKW 09:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. The CV on his homepage lists 11 publications, but I dont see evidence of notability as a researcher. Postdocs are typically not notable. Kusma (討論) 04:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, we do not need an article about every PhD holder. --WinHunter (talk) 04:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Good point, again Delete JKW 14:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable, getting a PhD doesn't make you notable. --Coredesat talk 04:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Not-Delete. Is being an administrator of a software project: JOELib notable? If not, then Delete. JKW 07:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Created by User:Joerg Kurt Wegner ~ trialsanderrors 07:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, creator/subject requests deletion. Thank you. ~ trialsanderrors 17:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Go ahead ... I am a subject ... wow that is extremely nonpersonal ... welcome in the electronic age;-) Sorry, causing discussions. JKW 18:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I was gonna say object, but that doesn't sound any better. But thanks again, too many "subjects" cling to their self-created articles like their livelihood depends on it. ~ trialsanderrors 18:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.