Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Júnior Lacayo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Well argued on both sides; article appears to fall solidly into the gray area. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Júnior Lacayo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was that the article Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD was contested on the grounds that the article met WP:NFOOTBALL since the Honduran top flight was inappropriately listed at WP:FPL at the time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG with the references listed in the article, such as . There's 27 other references in the Spanish version of the article es:Júnior Lacayo; haven't looked at them, but given the headlines, hard to imagine there isn't a second one on either the English of Spanish page that also doesn't meet WP:GNG.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Weak Keep - He just scrapes past WP:GNG. IJA (talk) 02:18, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. There appears to be some level of coverage, but the simple fact is that this individual has played only a handful of games of football in a league not deemed to be fully professional. It is difficult to see how he could be deemed to be a notable player at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 11:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies the GNG due to significant coverage in multiple reliable sources (see the Diario Deportivo Mas, El Siglo de Torreon or El Diez references in the article - and there are several others available online). While it's unclear whether the Honduran league is fully-pro, he made a significant contribution to his side's runners-up finish and did well enough in one year to earn a transfer to Santos Laguna. Jogurney (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep marginally passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 12:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per meeting the main notability guideline through significant coverage in reliable sources. Davewild (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.