Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jürgen Handke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Calling this keep instead of NC because the sources provided seem to have satisfied everybody who commented after they were presented. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Jürgen Handke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Largely unsourced puff piece for a professor who does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. dewiki article is also largely unsourced. His book, published in 2012, has been cited 106 times according to Google Scholar. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Long book reviews are a good start to establish notability here, let's give it some more time.
 * Delete It certainly reads like a puff piece in multiple areas. Also largely unsourced. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. Some reviews for possible WP:NCREATIVE case: . Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 08:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep based on WP:NAUTHOR and the sources Russ found. The sourcing and POV problems can be handled with cleanup tags. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the reviews listed by Russ go a long way to establishing WP:NAUTHOR. As Joe mentions, this should be tagged for cleanup, but not deleted. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.