Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Stalin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Close per WP:DENY, non-admin closure by User:Wikidemon. --Oakshade (talk) 22:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

J-Stalin
Note - I'm speedily removing this nomination per WP:DENY - Wikidemon (talk) 06:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable and based on its sources fails WP:BIO, the citations are well done but the coverage is passing or trivial in nature and he is not the main subject in multiple non-trivial major media coverage also failing WP:N and WP:GN also not a commercial successful artist, no record deal with a major record label, no significant album sales.Badhead456 (talk) 23:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC) — User: (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * I notice from your history that starting this AfD was your very first edit yet you're demonstrating familiarity with many Wikipedia guidelines. Can you please tell us if you're a sock? --Oakshade (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Contrary to the nom's stipulation, the artists has had a great amount of coverage and some of it very significant from the San Francisco Bay Guardian, the East Bay Express and The Seattle Times just to name a few., thus easily passing WP:N and its WP:GNG.--Oakshade (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * comment - Only the Guardian article is goes into any depth, the others are trivial coverage half paragraph promo looking mentions and the Seattle Times only mentions him for one sentence. So by wikipedia policy one article is not multiple non trivial coverage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinshumamá (talk • contribs) 20:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Besides admitting this has in-depth coverage, the second and forth far beyond the scope of "trival" (passing mention, directory listing, etc) and I would argue the third is too. All are by third party reliable sources.  Shinshumamá, like the nom, this was your very first edit.  Who are you a sock for?--Oakshade (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)