Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-ska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep - closing this early as it has been considerably improved since the AFD notice was placed, the consensus is to keep and to let it have its chance at DYK (eligibility would run out at the same time as the AFD closure becomes due). My talk page is always open for anybody who disagrees. Yomangani talk 02:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

J-ska
Low number of relevant Google results for J-ska suggests lack of notability. The fact that the only current reference is to some non-notable webpage further suggests that it is not a widely-accepted/used genre of music :: mikm t 22:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * When the article is ready for review I will note as such here. I should have completed it in my sandbox prior to publication. House of Scandal 23:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Neier 00:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Now that the article is more-or-less complete, I think there's little doubt the AfD tag should be removed. House of Scandal 08:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and recheck that all sources pass WP:RS. Dekimasu 14:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Doesn't seem to be that well-known, but the article does now have enough references to pass WP:N. I'm less sure about WP:MUSIC, but it seems to pass that too, provided the sources are reliable. -- Kesh 16:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - per house of scandal. It will make a good DYK. Baka man  00:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.