Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.B. Ruhl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. WjBscribe 23:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

J.B. Ruhl

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable professor, does not satisfy WP:PROF. Dsreyn 17:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd 19:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * keep from TFA, "one of the most cited U.S. academics in environmental law." Pete.Hurd 22:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pete. DickClarkMises 13:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- another easy case. The article speaks for itself.  The objection seems to be that this is a Stub, but he is noteworthy and with time a stub can be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.216.26 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep -- just saw a copy of hos book on ecosystem services. He is one of the top scholars, if not the number one person in the U.S., in environmental law. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.149.57.192 (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep -- I'd like to know what parts of WP:PROF the nominator does not think the article satisfies. Notability is clearly established.  Two major books.  Top chair at major department.  --Myke Cuthbert 15:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.