Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. A. Kemp & Co.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  23:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

J. A. Kemp & Co.
Non-notable UK intellectual property firm. Fails WP:CORP. Not even in the top 30 or so IP firms in the UK according to the Legal 500. Legis (talk - contributions) 22:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

''Note to sysops: I tagged the article for deletion on December 17, 2006. Legis apparently omitted to do so. Please consider closing the debate a little later than usually since it wasn't suitably tagged from the outset. --Edcolins 15:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)''


 * Comment. The firm is on a list of leading patent firms published in 2006 by the magazine Managing Intellectual Property. This nomination reminds me this one Votes for deletion/Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A., which you may find interesting. See also Category:Patent law firms... By the way, I abstain. --Edcolins 15:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 21:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - non-notable. Big  top  22:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete. This article looks like an advertisement. Google search for "J. A. Kemp" is swamped by a mathematician with the same name. Anthony Appleyard 20:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom... (and the hope that this dosn't get relisted again!) ---J.S (T/C) 20:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article fails to establish notability per WP:CORP and there are insufficient independent sources. Guy (Help!) 21:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.