Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. A. Konrath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

J. A. Konrath

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completing nomination for anonymous editor. Their rationale was "Yes, so instead of reverting why don't you do it? This is just an ad probably written by Konrath - zero reason to exist." On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's not exactly a nobody and is actually a pretty vocal contributor to many different sites. Galleycat and MediaBistro blog about him on an almost semi-daily basis. I've cleaned up a lot of the stuff in the article, sourced a lot of stuff, and I believe that it now passes notability guidelines.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The sources now in the article - including a significant mention in USA Today and a book review by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer - convince me he is notable. Good work, Tokyogirl. --MelanieN (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.