Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. B. Rainsberger (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

J. B. Rainsberger
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is not sufficiently notable. A single published programming book is not sufficient (See the first criteria of WP:ACADEMIC, significant impact needs to be proven.) Also, The Gordon Pask Award mentioned in the article is not prestigious enough. It looks like the award is no longer being awarded as I couldn't find any mention post-2010 and it's website www.paskaward.org is not available. Finally, the few mentioned articles and his work as a consultant are obviously not enough to establish notability. Lmbro (talk) 22:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and salt. No improvement since last AfD. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article doesn't make a case for WP:GNG nor any other notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.