Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Bandujeewa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 22:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

J. Bandujeewa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This biography of a living person (probably) is insufficiently referenced since 2009. It fails WP:V; it has no inline citations. It appears cricketarchive is a primary source. One appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a person whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete one sources is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and the coverage is routine.Now the the subject has played a single match  with his contribution being insufficient and has retired now the subject technically meets WP:NCRIC as he has played just 1 Match but the subject comprehensively fails the General Notability Guideline and has long retired last played the 1 match in in 1995-96 thus ending any scope of future contribution or any hope of meeting General Notability Guideline and as Per this discussion subject-specific notability guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline, except in clear cases where GNG does not apply to.NSPORTS does not supersede GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete' Not enough reliable sourcing to build an article. We don't even have enough to source his real name. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 18:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet GNG. Nothing to write about other than the single match he appeared in. Dee  03  15:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.