Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Barney Hawkins IV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

J. Barney Hawkins IV

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

One of a handful of people associated with Virginia Theological Seminary whose article was created today; as with most of the others I'm not sure the subject of this one meets the notability requirement. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 02:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   --  Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  04:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   --  Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  04:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does look like Wiki is being used here almost as a home page for this seminary. The seminary itself deserves a page, but pages for all the staff should be on the seminary's website not here. My vote goes for all the other staff pages too. Alberon (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:Notability_(academics)] and other criteria of WP:BIO. --Crunch (talk) 13:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Unlike Alberon, above, I am reviewing each of the VTS staff/faculty articles submitted for deletion individually based on the unique facts of each subject. --Crunch (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have reviewed them all and I don't think any of them qualify for a page. I was just too lazy to add the same entry underneath each AfD. Alberon (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Alright. I misunderstood your approach. --Crunch (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:PROF. Just a normal academic, nothing indicated he is particularly notable. These mostly look like CVs, not encylopedia entries (pasteing responses, nut checking individually). Associate Dean of a small school doesn't seem sufficient make him notableYobmod (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.