Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. League contracts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to J. League. No sourced content, so nothing to merge though it will still be there if anyone wants to see it. Jenks24 (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

J. League contracts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication this topic has been covered by independent reliable sources. C 679 14:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 14:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage. GiantSnowman 15:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge. Agree there is nothing inherently notable about Japanese football contracts to warrant an individual article, but it appears that the types of contracts are idiosyncratic enough to warrant mention on the J. League article. Fenix down (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 01:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect and Merge - per Fenix down. This should be mentioned at J. League, but does not qualify for a stand-alone article. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 7.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  06:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.