Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Roberto Trujillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

J. Roberto Trujillo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Academic who does not appear to meet notability guidelines of WP:ACADEMIC. After a thorough review last year concentrating on actual reliable sources, there seems to be very little of note here. Shritwod (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Good nomination, this needs to be discussed. I stubbed this article last year after this discussion; it had been listed at WP:CP because of copyright concerns which I was not able to verify, but clearly had other problems which needed to be dealt with. My opinion then was that this person was notable under WP:PROF by virtue of his citations/h-index. I've stopped using Chrome so no longer have the plug-in that calculates the h-index for me, and anyway don't have a good understanding of how that index varies by discipline; I'd appreciate some input on this from someone with more expertise. He has also received a fairly important honour from his national government; can anyone clarify how just significant the Ohtli Award is? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep on account of WP:NACADEMIC, i.e. "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." The subject is president of the Pan-American Society of Neuro-Virology. -The Gnome (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - reliable, third-party, published sources regarding the subject are not sufficient to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 20:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not really seeing independent secondary sources to really establish WP:GNG. In terms of WP:NACADEMIC mentioned above for being a society president, that is a factor that can weight towards notability, but not guarantee it. Without other factors to increase the notability, that presidency maybe only has sufficient weight for mention at the society's page, not inherited notability for the BLP. Kingofaces43 (talk) 19:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of any convincing argument that he meets our minimum notability requirements. I'm not convinced that the Pan-American Society of Neuro-Virology is a "major academic society" as understood in our guideline. I remain open to evidence either that his h-index is well above average for his field and age, or that the Ohtli Award is a sufficiently high and selective honour to satisfy ANYBIO – please ping me if such evidence is brought here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable - references aren't up to scratch.Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.