Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J8ded


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 04:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

J8ded

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 02:42, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - completely meets WP:WEB; a google search turns up 15,500 results, at least three of which are independent print publications running articles on this show (including but not limited to The Cincinnati Examiner, The Middletown Journal, and The Star-Ledger (New Jersey). Completely meets WP:GNG; these sources address the series directly and in detail, are reliable regional newspapers, and have no affiliation with the series. Article also does not fall into WP:NOT. Series stars multi-platinum-selling recording artist, which only adds to notability and interest/importance. CouplandForever (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I see a lot of reprints of press releases and some local "this guy says he's gonna be on the show" stuff. Google hits are not a measure of notability. The attachment of a particular person to the project does not make the series notable as notability is not inherited. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete WP is not an advertising platform. scope_creep (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to strongly refute your reasoning here. There is nothing about the content of this article the way it is currently written that indicates it is utilizing Wikipedia as an attempt to promote or advertise the topic. CouplandForever (talk) 20:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.