Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JB-83


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

JB-83

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD: tag removed with no explanation. No evidence of noatbility. Note that article creator is alleged creator of this vile-sounding mixture of liquors. TheLongTone (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, unsourced, WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment given the ingredients I should have CSD'd as a hoax.TheLongTone (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * ...That was a joke. But it's pity that (unless I've got it wrong) there isn't a CSD category appropriate for an obvious deletion cndidate like this one.TheLongTone (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I haven't found any sources to confirm this beverage exists, Wikipedia is not a website for homemade drinks. SwisterTwister   talk  21:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax - I've tagged it with db-hoax. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hoaxes need to be blatant for G3, which this is clearly not. It seems, in fact, almost certainly true - is there some reason to believe it's a hoax? Wily D  06:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, good point, sorry about that. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously not notable enough for an article. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

But it is a real drink as it is copyrighted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiebirkett (talk • contribs) 10:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure cocktail with no coverage by reliable secondary sources. A search for news articles doesn't bring up anything. The subject fails to meet the general notability criteria.-- xanchester  (t)  03:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.