Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JESS3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

JESS3

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability is questionable. Fails WP:CORP. Was PRODed, but contested, so it comes here. Also worth pointing out is that the author is affiliated with the organization (per his user page), so if this is kept it will most likely need to be re-written. T'Shael, The Vulcan Overlord  16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. - T'Shael, The Vulcan Overlord  16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The sources check out and notability is established, IMHO, by their Webby nomination this year.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 03:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep I am the author of this page and I would like to defend its inclusion on Wikipedia. Regardless of my conflict of interest, I have included numerous sources and I believe JESS3 is worthy of an article on the site. The company has had several high profile clients over the years. In addition, it has been nominated for a Webby Award. I can include another reference, a link to a story about JESS3 and one of its projects in Communication Arts, if that would help support this article. I'm reluctant to do so because of the discussion regarding my conflict of interest. -Maxjammett, 7/7/09
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.