Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JFM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus.  howch e  ng   {chat} 00:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

JFM
originally tagged for speedy delete as patent nonsense and I tend to agree with that but bringing it to a vote.--MONGO 11:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC) Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 17:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It's clearly not patent nonsense, as it is quite comprehensible. The question is whether it is original research or unverifiable, which is not a question for speedy deletion. Uncle G 12:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is at least a "conspiracy theory" based on this. However, I'd suggest moving the page to Jenseitsflugmaschine. JFM will almost certainly end up as a disambiguation page. -Rholton 23:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, seems to be hard to verify. Stifle 21:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.