Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JKFZ Cambridge International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star  Mississippi  14:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

JKFZ Cambridge International School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Insufficient secondary sources in English to fulfil WP:NSCHOOL requirements. Page has previously been nominated for CSD. There are no sources given on the page, with the exception of a link to the official school website at the bottom of the page in external links, which appears to be no longer available. 33ABGirl (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Schools,  and China. 33ABGirl (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Insufficient secondary sources in English – is this meant to imply that there are sufficient non-English secondary sources? If so then keep. small jars 18:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * "Insufficient secondary sources in English" was bad wording on my part and was  not  meant to imply sufficient non-English sources. Nonetheless, a search using the schools Chinese name "江科附中", yielded largely links to marketing sites and blogs, with almost no results when searching Google News.  33ABGirl (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Fails GNG. Ping me if independent (not government) reliable (not promotional) sources with significant coverage addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  11:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.