Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JKO EZ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to J. K. Organisation. Per duplication. If the main article should go up for AFD, feel free. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

JKO EZ

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable organization. I can only find one appropriate source, and I don't think one is enough to satisfy WP:ORG. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 11:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * There are many links for JK Organisation
 * http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/article1709736.ece
 * http://info.shine.com/Article/Industries/JK-Organisation-We-have-about-50-vacancies-every-month/5762/cid1.aspx
 * http://indiaedunews.net/Rajasthan/JK_Organization_setting_up_university_in_Jaipur_12790/
 * I feel that the page must not be deleted as it represents a very prestigious group of India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archiegoel (talk • contribs) 11:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I can add more links
 * http://www.iiml.ac.in/events/chspeech.pdf
 * http://www.exchange4media.com/brandspeak/brandspeak_FS.asp?section_id=35&news_id=40205&tag=6542
 * http://www.jklakshmi.com/pdf/JK_Award_Brochure-IIM09.pdf
 * http://www.scribd.com/doc/50118699/16/JK-Organization-Emblem-%C2%B1-An-Icon-of-Value-Based-Growth
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.247.199.196 (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: not enough to meet WP:N - and Archiegoel: take a look at WP:RS.-- Dewritech (talk)  09:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or, if this is a valid alternate name, redirect to the pre-existing article under the correct title. This is a POVFORK. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:39, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.