Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JLG Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under A7. Martinmsgj 17:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

JLG Architects

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Makes a lot of grand claims, but the only thing I could find on Google were directory entries. Fails WP:V Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 15:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete without prejudice for recreation per nom. Only edit is by a SPA, would not be surprised if COI. However, should they (or anyone else) choose to write a sourced NPOV article which would demonstrate notability, and clarify their relationship with the article subject, go right ahead. If anyone feels my reasoning here is inconsistent with my other AFD comments today, the difference is there is no assertion of notability and no attempt at sourcing here, and all in question is one single edit which is easy to redo. In the other case, there are sources that might be enough for borderline notability which therefore require discussion. Martinp (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - nothing reliable on which to base article. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 20:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Google News Archives reports hits, but almost all of them seem to be copies of press releases about the hiring of employees or similar routine local business page announcements. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.