Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JOHN MARK BARTOLOME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete under WP:G5. (non-admin closure) M assiveYR   ♠  10:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

JOHN MARK BARTOLOME

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe this person is notable enough for an article, the references given are not good enough (in my opinion), as two are blogs, and one is to a genealogical website with an image that doesn't exist. This also may be an autobiography, as the subject's Instagram name (given in infobox) is the same as author's username - so concerns of conflicts of interest and self-promotion (especially number 4 on link).  Seagull123  Φ  16:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Seems like WP:COI and WP:SOAP. A blog maintained by JM Bartolome was linked instead of the actual source on Starstruck. The actual source made no mention of him. WP:GNG fails, can't find anything other than the blog and fb. ArcticDragonfly (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Blatant self-promotion. See also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnMark0909. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G5 block by JohnMark0909 38.96.9.224 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.