Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JOH Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

JOH Architects

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established, and no evidence found for it to be met: no major publications, awards or projects. ELEKHHT 04:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 04:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I added another reference for their competition success but that really just emphasises that they are a small firm winning their first award in what appears to be a local competition. No other evidence found to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 16:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * delete blatantly fails WP:CORP. minor company. LibStar (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per AllyD. Nick-D (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, neither of the awards seem to be particularly notable in and of themselves, and I don't see any other indication of notability for this firm. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.