Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JRJR Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

JRJR Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is/was (status unknown following bankruptcy) a holding company for some MLM firms, including Longaberger Baskets. This was a no-consensus close in 2014 and other than some coverage of the 2018 struggles of its constituent orgs, there's nothing since that time that would establish notability of the parent company. Coverage appears limited to name drops and nothing significant. StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.       StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.       StarM 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Nominator note prior Afd is Articles for deletion/CVSL as I'm not sure how to make it show up up top. Feel free to remove this if you know how to integrate it.       StarM 19:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: No significant coverage. My assertion is if the only significant coverage is that of a closure, it still isn't significant. Additional issues with the article exist including a reliance on mostly Press Releases for sources and links to their subsidiaries, if it were to be kept should be a WP:TNT situation (I still vote delete and stay that way.) ~RAM (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Like the nom the references I find are related to Longaberger Baskets, which does not provide notability for the subject of the article. I don't see any claims in the article the lead me to believe there is anything to meet WP:GNG Jeepday (talk) 18:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete sources are dead links, unrelated or PR - a quick google fails to show notability - so fails WP:ORG/WP:GNG. KylieTastic (talk) 17:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.