Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSA Princeton 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete a7Blnguyen | rant-line 07:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

JSA Princeton 2006
This is probably a legitimate subject, but instead of being written in an ecyclopedic style, it focusses on two or three non-notable people that apparently attended the program. While I'm sure both of these fine gentlemen are very "cool" and everything, they definitely don't deserve an article detailing their lives and everyday activities. tmopkisn tlka 06:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC) style="color: rgb(255, 10, 0);"> Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTWHAT I MESSED UP 06:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Violation of WP:BIO, vanity article, too. Ryulong 06:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete CSD A7, non notable group. Deletion would allow a editor a clean slate to in the future to write a legitimate article about the subject (if some one feels it nessary).-- blue 520  06:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - "Besides having saved the human race fourteen times" I call vanity on that --IslaySolomon 06:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Don't forget that "Chen is the sexiest man on the quad with his IPOD boom box" or whatever it says. Is there a CSD template for vanity reasons, instead of db-group? And while we're at it, perhaps get WP:AIV to deal with . Ryulong 06:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Speedy WP:VAIN David <span
 * Speedy delete vanity, nn notable.--John Lake 06:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.